MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406703185 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c10207

Amino Acid-Driven One-Step Process to Transform CO<sub>2</sub> into Barium Carbonate Nanoparticles

2025· article· en· W4406703185 on OpenAlexaff
Qingyang Li, Malcolm Xing, Bingyun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureWest Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission
KeywordsBarium carbonateNanoparticleCarbonateBariumChemistryMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryEngineeringRaw material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Controlling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission is critical since CO 2 is the primary contributor to global warming, posing significant threats to human survival and leading to unwanted changes in biological systems. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) has been studied worldwide, but methods that are effective, efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly are lacking. In this study, we developed a unique method to achieve CO 2 capture and conversion in a single step. The process of capturing and converting CO 2 into value-added BaCO 3 nanoparticles (nano-BaCO 3 ) is detailed as an illustrative example. Nano-BaCO 3, with an average size of 85 nm, was obtained without requiring external energy. The use of amino acid resulted in faster CO 2 absorption and more uniform particle sizes compared to the same process without the use of amino acid. Moreover, the amino acid was recycled and reused without any additional treatment, and nano-BaCO 3 production was observed in multiple cycles. In addition, our method has been proven to be applicable for CO 2 conversion from simulated flue gases with various CO 2 levels (e.g., 4% and 10%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207