A coupled non-orthogonal hypoelastic constitutive model for woven fabrics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wrinkling, a common manufacturing-induced defect, can be delayed in dry woven fabrics by applying tension during processing. Such a known solution in industrial practice, is still not sufficiently implemented in the modeling and simulation of woven fabrics. This study proposes a new constitutive model considering fabric’s inherent coupling, non-orthogonality, and non-linearity. First, the intrinsic coupling in question is distinguished from the typical coupling presented by the Hook’s law. Then, the most influential forms of coupling are chosen and introduced to the model. Moreover, via experimental evidence, we reveal that the concept of inherent coupling raises a new issue: the load history dependency of the fabric. Accordingly, the base model was evolved to a hypoelastic form to capture this dependency. The stiffness functions of the introduced model are determined, considering the mechanical behavior of a typical polypropylene (PP)/glass plain weave and the underlying meso-scale sources of the coupling. An inverse method was employed to identify the unknown model parameters. While the basic loading modes such as the uniaxial tension and picture frame tests are utilized for model calibration, the more complex loading conditions such as the simultaneous biaxial tensile-shear test, which would be more comparable to actual forming processes, are selected as the independent datasets to validate accuracy of the model. Comparisons with the experimental results demonstrated that the coupled model predicts the behavior of the fabric more accurately than the uncoupled model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it