P0296 Comparison of clinical characteristics of Montreal classification group A3 patients with Crohn’s disease in Korea: Results from the Prospective and Retrospective CONNECT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The CONNECT study, a nationwide multicenter cohort study of Crohn’s disease (CD) in Korea, was designed to investigate the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of CD patients. Starting in 2009, the study enrolled patients in both a prospective cohort (patients diagnosed since 2009) and a retrospective cohort (patients diagnosed before 2009). Recent trends show an increase in elderly-onset CD (EOCD) in Korea, alongside cases in younger individuals; however, research focusing specifically on EOCD patients remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of EOCD patients using data from this nationwide, multicenter cohort in Korea. Methods We analyzed data both the prospective and retrospective CONNECT cohorts, which included 2,399 CD patients diagnosed between 1982 and 2019 (retrospective cohort of 1,224 patients, prospective cohort of 1,175 patients). Of these, 244 patients were identified as having Montreal classification A3 at diagnosis. Fifty-six EOCD patients (diagnosed at age 60 or older) were compared with 188 adult-onset CD patients (diagnosed at age 40-59) in aspects of baseline characteristics, medication use, and bowel resection rates. Results EOCD patients had a higher proportion of females (55.4%) compared to the adult-onset CD group (31.5%). Ileal involvement was the most common location of disease at diagnosis in EOCD patients (51.8%). Previous use of anti-tuberculosis medication was more frequent in EOCD patients than in the adult-onset CD group (29.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.047). Although there were no significant differences in disease behavior at diagnosis or ever use of medication between the groups, EOCD patients showed a significantly lower risk of bowel resection (p = 0.008). Conclusion EOCD patients in Korea appear to present with distinct clinical features and have a more favorable prognosis, as evidenced by a reduced need for bowel resection compared with adult-onset CD patients. Further research is essential to better understand the unique needs of EOCD patients, including the development of tailored therapeutic guidelines that address the complexities associated with aging and the management of CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".