MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406704266 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0524

P0350 Asia Pacific Association of Gastroenterology consensus statements on histopathological evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

2025· article· en· W4406704266 on OpenAlexaff
Rupert W. Leong, Thanaboon Chaemsupaphan, Huiyu Lin, Wee Chian Lim, Choon Jin Ooi, John David Chetwood, Ren Mao, Hualian Wu, Shu‐Chen Wei, Govind K Makharia, Vineet Ahuja, Rupa Banerjee, Julajak Limsrivilai, Satimai Aniwan, Pises Pisespongsa, Ida Hilmi, Raja Affendi Raja Ali, Wai K. Leung, Siew C. Ng, Byong Duk Ye, Teruaki Kobayashi, Kana Matsuoka, CM Chau, Anapat Sanpavat, Chia‐Tung Shun, Pavitratha Puspanathan, Richard B. Gearry, Silvio Danese, Christopher Ma, Aviv Pudipeddi, Sudarshan Paramsothy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory Bowel DiseasesGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineAsia pacificPathologyGeneral surgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mucosal histological activity is increasingly valued as a treatment endpoint in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In the Asia Pacific region, however, the utility and acceptability of IBD histology as a treatment endpoint is uncertain due to the heterogeneity of IBD prevalence, resourcing, and level of knowledge among practitioners. There is an opportunity to engage clinicians to harmonise histology reporting and collaborate with pathologists in this field. To this end, we developed statements to determine their consensus through anonymous voting on histological features, processing, reporting, and relevance to treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Methods Representatives of the Asia Pacific Association of Gastroenterology, in collaboration with pathologists, voted anonymously in accordance with modified Delphi methodology on statements relevant to IBD and histology. Domains of interest were histological features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, relevance to clinical management, and the potential utility of artificial intelligence in grading histological disease severity. Level of evidence and recommendation grade were included in accordance with the NHMRC guidelines of Australia. Results Consensus was reached on 37 statements concerning definitions, pathology processing and reporting, scoring system, and relevance to clinical outcomes (Figure). There was uncertainty on escalating treatment when histological remission is not achieved, preventing consensus on this statement. Knowledge gaps were identified over the role of artificial intelligence. Conclusion These consensus statements provide recommendations, with specific relevance to the Asia Pacific region, on the role of histology in IBD ways to harmonise its use. The consensus statements will promote understanding and applicability in research and in the routine management of IBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.166
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.269
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1660.269
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0060.010
Research integrity0.0110.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→