Pyramid Fine and Coarse Attentions for Land Cover Classification from Compact Polarimetric SAR Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Land cover classification from compact polarimetry (CP) imagery captured by the launched RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) is important but challenging due to class signature ambiguity issues and speckle noise. This paper presents a new land cover classification method to improve the learning of discriminative features based on a novel pyramid fine- and coarse-grained self-attention transformer (PFC transformer). The fine-grained dependency inside a non-overlapping window and coarse-grained dependencies between non-overlapping windows are explicitly modeled and concatenated using a learnable linear function. This process is repeated in a hierarchical manner. Finally, the output of each stage of the proposed method is spatially reduced and concatenated to take advantage of both low- and high-level features. Two high-resolution (3 m) RCM CP SAR scenes are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare it to other state-of-the-art deep learning methods. The results show that the proposed approach achieves an overall accuracy of 93.63%, which was 4.83% higher than the best comparable method, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach for land cover classification from RCM CP SAR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".