MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406705204 · doi:10.1093/fshmag/vuae026

Advancing black bass management and conservation to benefit fish populations, fisheries, and people

2025· article· en· W4406705204 on OpenAlexaff
David P. Philipp, Mark S. Ridgway, Cory D. Suski, Julie E. Claussen, Steven J. Cooke

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMinistry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryBass (fish)Fisheries managementFish <Actinopterygii>Catch and releaseGeographyRecreational fishingBiologyFishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the colonization of North America by Europeans, black bass Micropterus spp. of the family Centrarchidae have been the basis for lucrative recreational fisheries, and even small-scale commercial fisheries. Early accounts by James Henshall in the late 1800s celebrated black bass while acknowledging the importance of sustainable management during periods of intense harvest (Henshall, 1881). Species-specific accounts followed, as well, along with other more holistic, scientific tomes (e.g., Robbins & MacCrimmon, 1974). Pioneers in black bass science such as Homer Swingle, George Bennett, and William Childers generated foundational knowledge on black bass biology, ecology, propagation, and management. Not surprisingly, early efforts focused on the more common species such as Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu, Spotted Bass M. punctulatus, and what we now know as two separate species, Largemouth Bass M. nigricans and Florida Bass M. salmoides (see Near & Kim, 2021). Recognizing the stature of black bass fisheries, there have been a number of efforts over the years to assemble black bass scientists and managers in focused symposia to reflect on and advance black bass science and management. The first major symposium, organized by the Sport Fishing Institute (Dick Stroud, Bob Jenkins, Larry Larimore, and others), was held in 1975 in Tulsa, Oklahoma, culminating in what became the bible for bass management for 20+ years (Stroud & Clepper, 1975). The second symposium, organized in conjunction with the American Fisheries Society (David Philipp, Mark Ridgway, and others), was held in 2000 in St. Louis, Missouri, yielding a published proceedings (Philipp & Ridgway, 2002). In 2009, a tome on the biology of centrarchid fishes was published (Cooke & Philipp, 2009), including detailed contemporary species accounts (Warren, 2009). And in 2015, Tringali et al. (2015) published the outputs from a symposium on the diversity of the black bass with a ­decidedly evolutionary biology and biodiversity ­conservation focus. Collectively, those bodies of work/syntheses have all served to advance how we think about and manage black bass. Yet, it is also apparent that the challenges of an uncertain future demand that we improve our black bass management and conservation strategies. Indeed, times they are a changing. Over the past decade, the designation of new black bass species has stretched management capabilities. Climate change is apparent and is having dramatic effects on freshwater ecosystems (Ficke et al., 2007). Invasive species are ubiquitous and, in some cases, black bass are themselves the introduced species (Long & Seguy, 2024), in turn creating novel ecosystems with additional management issues such as interactions with western salmonids. Bass are among the most heavily managed species on the planet with millions spent annually on habitat management, harvest regulations, and stocking (reviewed in Noble, 2002), yet the evidence base supporting such efforts is often weak (Taylor et al., 2019). Conflicts between conservation of black bass diversity and recreational fishing opportunities are intensifying. The social context for black bass fishing is being revisited with growing conflict between other water users and bass tournament organizers in some locales. Given the array of these complex issues, the diverse actors involved in the black bass universe need to come together to find pathways for working collaboratively to advance issues of mutual concern supported by robust scientific research. While others have had similar goals (e.g., Long et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2019), none of the past efforts have involved the full suite of constituents involved within the black bass universe. For example, early efforts focused almost exclusively on supporting the recreational sector with little appreciation for the role of small-scale commercial fisheries or fish harvested by Indigenous/tribal fishers and community members. Moreover, research ­priorities have tended to be discussed independent of ­perspectives from management agencies or stakeholder groups. There is urgent need to revisit black bass management with a collaborative goal of identifying evidence-based actions that balance conservation and management objectives, and future-proof black bass management for the benefit of black bass and ­people. To that end, we are thrilled to announce and welcome you to the 2025 Black Bass Symposium, which will be held in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society in San Antonio, Texas in August 10–14, 2025. What is unique about this black bass symposium is that it is intended to extend beyond scientists and managers. The Symposium’s program is being designed to create pathways for diverse actors ranging from high school bass fishing teams to Tribal government leaders to fishing industry representatives to the outdoor media to come together to share and learn. This event is an opportunity to re-envision black bass management and long-term conservation, where bass are managed not only for the benefit of one constituency, but where the goals for long-term sustainability meet the needs for all. Such bold actions will require courage and creativity. The organizers of the symposium are creating opportunities for candid and creative input, including a day-long interactive session with non-scientists and speakers that extend beyond the usual scientific participants (led by Tom Lang and Steve Bardin). We now are under a year until the BB2025 event, and soon abstracts will be due and travel plans will need to be made. The organizing team will be doing their very best to try to make the event affordable and accessible to all with special rates for non-AFS participants. This will NOT be just another conference or symposium, rather, it is meant to be a catalyst to chart the course for the future of bass management and conservation. However, rest assured that although this “event” will begin soon, its impact will hopefully extend for years afterward through webinars and other activities designed to engage our community. So, stay tuned and add yourself to our mailing list. We look forward to seeing YOU in San Antonio in August 2025. To be added to the BB2025 mailing list, visit https://forms.gle/2Jvd1WvVWwKsayEk8 BB2025 Website: None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheriesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207