MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406705444 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0055

DOP016 Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease With 3 Years of Treatment: Results From the FORTIFY Open-Label Long-Term Extension

2025· article· en· W4406705444 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Rosaria Ferrante, Remo Panaccione, J.-F. Colombel, Marla C. Dubinsky, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, James O. Lindsay, Alexandra Song, Yong Yao, Y Zhang, Javier Zambrano, Fernando Aponte, W. Rachel Duan, Geert D’Haens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseOpen labelCrohn diseaseTerm (time)DiseaseSurgeryAdverse effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The FORTIFY maintenance open-label extension (OLE) is an ongoing phase 3 substudy evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB), a p19 interleukin-23 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Previously, we presented the 2-year (Y) results from the OLE assessed through MAR2023, at which time most pts had yet to complete the week (W) 152 visit. Here, we report the full 2Y results with all pts having completed the W152 study visit. Methods Pts completing 52W of RZB maintenance were eligible to enroll in the FORTIFY (NCT03105102) OLE1,2, during which pts received 180mg subcutaneous (SC) RZB every 8W (Q8W), starting at W56, except pts who previously received rescue therapy (details in Figure footnote) as they continued 360mg SC Q8W in the OLE. Pts with inadequate response (increased symptoms + objective marker of inflammation) during the OLE received rescue therapy and remained on 360mg SC through the end of the study. Efficacy (endpoint definitions in Figure footnote) was assessed through W152 of RZB treatment (2Y in the OLE) using as observed (AO) and nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods. Data before receiving rescue therapy and upon/after receiving rescue therapy in the OLE are presented separately. All enrolled pts were included in the safety analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported on/after the first dose in the OLE were summarized (cutoff date: 01MAR2024). Results In the OLE, 1148 pts received ≥1 dose of RZB. Prior to receiving rescue therapy (pt numbers in Figure footnote), efficacy rates (per AO data) remained stable from W56 to W152 (both doses) for stool frequency/abdominal pain score (SF/APS) clinical remission (180mg, 69.8% to 74.8%; 360mg, 46.6% to 61.8% (84/136) and per CD Activity Index (CDAI) clinical remission (180mg, 72.9% to 81.1%; 360mg, 54.5% to 72.0%, endoscopic response (180mg: 57.5% to 75.7%; 360mg: 40.7% to 66.0%), and endoscopic remission (180mg: 41.6% to 62.4%; 360mg: 24.7% to 43.8%) (Figure). Similar results were observed per NRI data. Pts who received rescue therapy in the OLE (180mg, n=147; 360mg, n=76) also demonstrated clinical and endoscopic improvements by W152, irrespective of RZB dose received prior to rescue. The profiles of TEAEs and AEs of special interest were consistent with RZB’s known safety profile (Table).3,4 Conclusion Durable clinical and endoscopic efficacy was observed with long-term RZB maintenance therapy in the FORTIFY OLE. Pts who received rescue therapy in the OLE also showed clinical and endoscopic improvements by W152. No new safety risks for RZB were identified, supporting its long-term use in treating CD. References 1. Ferrante M, Feagan BG, Panés J, Baert F, Louis E, Dewit O, et al. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab Treatment in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: Results from the Phase 2 Open-Label Extension Study. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2021 Jun 2;jjab093. 2. Ferrante M, Panaccione R, Baert F, Bossuyt P, Colombel JF, Danese S, et al. Risankizumab as maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: results from the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase 3 FORTIFY maintenance trial. The Lancet. 2022 May;399(10340):2031–46. 3. Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Puig L, Ohtsuki M, Beissert S, Gooderham M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial up to 5 years of follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2023 Dec;89(6):1149–58. 4. Ferrante M, Panaccione R, Colombel JF, Dubinsky M, Hisamatsu T, Lindsay JO, et al. DOP53 Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease up to 3 Years of Treatment: Results From the FORTIFY Open-Label Long-term Extension. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2024 Jan 24;18(Supplement_1):i168–70.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207