MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406705648 · doi:10.37253/jcep.v4i1.7844

Feasibility Study of Housing Project Investment in Batam Center

2023· article· en· W4406705648 on OpenAlexaff
Sheera Shaviera, Mulia Pamadi, Amanatullah Savitri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Civil Engineering and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCenter (category theory)Investment (military)BusinessPolitical scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With population growth, the need for housing as a living space continues to grow in both urban and rural areas. An individual's housing needs vary according to personal and financial circumstances. Before starting construction, a feasibility study should be conducted. The purpose of the analysis is to positively and negatively assess the feasibility of the project in all aspects such as customer satisfaction, expectations and requirement assessment. The analysis is carried out after collecting data, such as plan drawings, budget, and cash flow plans. The feasibility analysis in this report is seen from the technical and financial aspects. In the aspect of technical feasibility seen from the value of KDB and KLB. In terms of financial feasibility seen from the NPV, IRR, PI, and PP value. The KDB value is 42.43% < 60% and the KLB value is 60% £ 60%, with a positive NPV of IDR 31,221,998,389.25, an IRR of 22.41% where the NPV value is zero, PP 2 years < 5 years investment period, and PI 1.22 > 1, it can be said that this project is feasible in technical and financial aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Civil Engineering and PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207