MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406705670 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0195

P0021 Long non-coding RNAs as predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy in Ulcerative Colitis patients

2025· article· en· W4406705670 on OpenAlexaff
Rahim Heydari, Mohammad Javad Tavassolifar, Mohammad Hossein Derakhshan Nazari, Shabnam Shahrokh, Anna Meyfour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisTumor necrosis factor alphaInflammatory bowel diseaseInfliximabInflammatory responseInternal medicineTumor necrosis factorsCoding (social sciences)GastroenterologyImmunologyInflammationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts with more than 200 nucleotides that modulate molecular mechanisms in several ways, including epigenetic modification, transcription, post-transcription, translation, and post-translation. We have recently demonstrated the involvement of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their role in the accurate diagnosis of IBD patients 1,2. In this study, we aim to determine the potential of lncRNAs in predicting the response of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients to anti-TNF-α therapy. Methods Twenty-two UC patients who were naïve to Adalimumab biosimilar, CinnoRa enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Colonic tissue samples were collected at baseline and week 14 after treatment. Based on our previous reports, a list of important lncRNAs in IBD pathogenesis was prepared and their expression was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate the predictive potentiality of lncRNAs in differentiating UC non-responders (UCN) from UC Responders (UCR) at baseline. Results Among analyzed lncRNAs, significant dysregulation of H19 and TUG1 was observed in UCNs compared to UCRs before receiving anti-TNF therapy. Interestingly, this difference between the two patient groups was still detected in the 14th week after treatment. Machine learning algorithm results and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that these two lncRNAs could appropriately discriminate UCN patients from UCR with more than 90% accuracy and AUC > 0.8. Conclusion We concluded that expression profiles of lncRNAs are different in pretreatment lesions of UC patients before receiving anti-TNF therapy. Importantly, lncRNAs are involved in the distinctive molecular response of UC patients to anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, H19 and TUG1 can serve as biomarkers in predicting the response of UC patients to anti-TNF therapy at baseline. References 1. 2. Heydari R, Karimi P, Meyfour A. Long non-coding RNAs as pathophysiological regulators, therapeutic targets and novel extracellular vesicle biomarkers for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Biomed Pharmacother. Jul 2024;176:116868. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116868

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207