MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406706843 · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02526-3

Quantum-computing-enhanced algorithm unveils potential KRAS inhibitors

2025· article· en· W4406706843 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Ghazi Vakili, Christoph Gorgulla, Jamie Snider, AkshatKumar Nigam, Dmitry S. Bezrukov, Daniel Varoli, Alex Aliper, Daniil Polykovskiy, Krishna Mohan Das, Huel Cox, Anna Lyakisheva, Ardalan Hosseini Mansob, Zhong Yao, L. Bitar, Danielle Tahoulas, Dora Čerina, Eugene V. Radchenko, Xiao Ding, Jinxin Liu, Fanye Meng, Feng Ren, Yudong Cao, Igor Štagljar, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Alex Zhavoronkov

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Resources CanadaNvidiaOntario Genomics InstituteStanford Bio-XCystic Fibrosis CanadaGenome CanadaAdvanced Research Projects AgencyGovernment of CanadaDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyOntario Research FoundationSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsKRASComputer scienceAlgorithmQuantum computerComputational biologyQuantumChemistryBiologyPhysicsGeneticsMutationGeneQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a quantum–classical generative model for small-molecule design, specifically targeting KRAS inhibitors for cancer therapy. We apply the method to design, select and synthesize 15 proposed molecules that could notably engage with KRAS for cancer therapy, with two holding promise for future development as inhibitors. This work showcases the potential of quantum computing to generate experimentally validated hits that compare favorably against classical models. A hybrid model combines quantum and classical approaches to generate compounds targeting the KRAS protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207