MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406717059 · doi:10.1088/1361-6595/adad13

Optical inline interferometer for enhanced low-field detection via electric-field induced second harmonic generation

2025· article· en· W4406717059 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Baptiste Billeau, Patrick Cusson, Denis V. Seletskiy, Stephan Reuter

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Sources Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Innovation CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterferometryElectric fieldField (mathematics)HarmonicOpticsSecond-harmonic generationPhysicsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsAcousticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nonlinear optical methods, such as Electric-Field Induced Second Harmonic (E-FISH) generation, have emerged as powerful tools for diagnosing electric fields in plasma environments. The E-FISH technique depends quadratically on the electric field under study, which results in complete insensitivity to its polarity and diminished sensitivity to its low amplitudes. Both of these challenges have been recently resolved in a Local Oscillator Electric-Field Induced Second Harmonic (LOE-FISH) technique, introducing coherent homodyne amplification of a weak E-FISH signal using of an optical local oscillator field. Early LOE-FISH demonstrations relied on a delay line, resulting in decreased accuracy due to the higher sensitivity of the interferometer to environmental noise. In this work, we introduce an "inline" design of the interferometer with maximally shared common paths and a balanced photodetection system, thus greatly reducing sensitivity to environmental noise and laser technical noise and hence improving the robustness of the technique. To this end, we achieve a factor of 143 increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when LOE-FISH is compared to E-FISH. Furthermore, we successfully measured an electric field as low as 32 V/cm with an SNR of 7.4 during 0.15 s measurement time, estimating an unprecedented detection limit of 12.1 V/(cm √Hz). Our work represents a significant step toward real-time, high-precision diagnostics of electric fields in complex plasma environments, electric field amplitude fluctuations can influence reactive species' generation and overall process efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Sources Science and TechnologySame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207