MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406722904 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.18.633704

Fate of a supergene in the shift from diploidy to polyploidy

2025· preprint· en· W4406722904 on OpenAlexaff
Emiliano Mora‐Carrera, Narjes Yousefi, Giacomo Potente, Rebecca L. Stubbs, Barbara Keller, Étienne Léveillé‐Bourret, Stefan Grob, Ferhat Celep, Giorgi Tedoradze, Elena Conti

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupergene (geology)PloidyEvolutionary biologyBiologyGeographyGeneticsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Despite the evolutionary importance of supergenes, their properties in polyploids remain unexplored. Polyploid genomes are expected to undergo chromosomal rearrangements and gene losses over time, potentially affecting supergene architecture. The iconic distyly supergene ( S -locus), controlling a floral heteromorphism with two self-incompatible morphs, has been well-documented in diploids, but remains unknown in polyploids. Primula , the classic model for distyly since Darwin, is ancestrally diploid and distylous, yet polyploid, homostylous species with a single, self-compatible floral morph evolved repeatedly. The intraspecific loss of distyly is associated with small loss-of-function mutations in the S -locus CYP T gene controlling style length and female self-incompatibility. Over longer timescales, relaxed selection on CYP T should generate greater accumulation of larger mutations, including exon and gene loss. By analyzing the first assembled genome of an allotetraploid, homostylous species ( Primula grandis ) in a comparative framework, we discovered two, nearly identical S -locus alleles in the same subgenome, suggesting it originated via inter-specific hybridization between a homostylous and a distylous progenitor. Conformant to predictions from theory, the macroevolutionary loss of distyly coincided with considerable degeneration of CYP T , while other S -locus genes remained largely unaffected, suggesting the shift to homostyly preceded and facilitated polyploid establishment. At the whole-genome level, we found minimal subgenome dominance — as expected, given the inferred recent origin of P. grandis — and highly reduced genetic diversity, congruently with its narrow distribution and self-compatibility. This study provides the first comparison of a supergene across ploidy levels and reproductive systems, contributing new knowledge on the previously unknown fate of supergenes in polyploids. SIGNIFICANCE This study advances knowledge on genome evolution by elucidating how supergenes (clusters of tightly linked genes) evolve across species with different sets of chromosomes and reproductive systems. By analyzing the newly assembled genome of the polyploid, self-compatible Primula grandis in a broad framework, we provide the first comparison of the distyly supergene between diploid outcrossers and polyploid self-fertilizers. We discovered one pair of identical supergene alleles in the same subgenome, rather than one pair per subgenome, revealing the species originated via a cross between a self-compatible and a self-incompatible progenitor. Conformant to theory, the gene controlling female self-incompatibility and style length ( CYP T ) was considerably degenerated, because of relaxed selection over time, with the rest of the supergene largely unaffected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207