MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406726515 · doi:10.1186/s43045-025-00502-4

Cognitive impairment, depressive and anxiety disorders among post-COVID-19 survivors: a follow-up study

2025· article· en· W4406726515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Apip Abdul Latif, Sandra W. Elseesy

Bibliographic record

VenueMiddle East Current Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Depression (economics)MedicineClinical psychologyCognitive impairmentDepressive symptomsPsychologyPsychiatryCognitionInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Psychiatric signs may be induced by the cytokine storm that is implicated in the immune response to coronavirus through neuro-inflammation. Survivors disclosed symptoms of obsessive–compulsive disorder, melancholy, anxiety, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. For the first year following the SARS disease, they generally suffer from suicide and psychosis. Aim To evaluate the presence of cognitive impairment, anxiety disorders, and depression in adult survivors of COVID-19, 1 month and 3 months post-recovery. Method It is an observational longitudinal study. Forty-four COVID-19 survivor patients, with no past psychiatric history were evaluated at 3 months and 1 month after recovery. The Montreal Cognitive Impairment Basic (MoCA-B) was employed to evaluate cognitive impairment. However, anxiety and depressive disorders were identified via structured clinical interview for DSM IV, axis I (SCID-I) and their severity was examined by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) consecutively. Results Regarding cognitive impairment, MoCA-B results showed a mean score of 25.95 ± 1.98 in the 1st interview and 27.7 ± 1.05 in the 2nd interview, with a marked change, P- value = 0.001. SCID-I showed that 43.2% of our sample was diagnosed with both anxiety and depression at 1 month post-recovery, with the improvement of some cases at 3 months to affect only 18.2%, showing a statistically significant difference, P- value = 0.036. The percentage of patients who suffered from sleep difficulties was 59.1% at 1st interview and 27.3% at 2nd interview. While 61.4% of patients suffered from fatigue and low concentration at 1st interview and went down to 31.8% at 2nd interview, showing a statistically significant difference, P -value < 0.001. The severity of depression and anxiety in those diagnosed also declined from the 1st interview to the 2nd, BDI mean score in 1st interview was 12.30 ± 10.46, and in the 2nd interview was 7.09 ± 9.24 with marked variation P -value < 0.001, while BAI means score at the 1st interview was 18.18 ± 16.85 and at the 2nd interview was 11.32 ± 16.12 with statistically significant difference P = 0.001. Conclusion Impairment of cognitive functions; especially delayed recall; was one of the important COVID-19 psychiatric sequelae, In addition to anxiety and depressive signs in the form of depressed/anxious mood, fatigue, decreased concentration, and sleep disturbances. The severity of symptoms declined over the 3 months period of the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMiddle East Current PsychiatrySame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207