A Brief History of Disaster Response and Recovery Efforts at the Newfoundland/Gander International Airport 1941-1985
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Newfoundland Airport, later renamed the Gander International Airport, was built in 1938–39 to deliver regular flight services that supported aircraft refueling stopovers for flights travelling from New York, United States to London, United Kingdom. It is also the site of significant aviation disaster and large-scale emergency events thathave brought the world to Gander (and Gander to the world), including the Arrow Air Flight 1285 crash in 1985 and the accommodation of diverted aircraft, passengers, and crew on September 11, 2001. Since its inception, the Airport and the citizens of the subsequently developed Town of Gander have played an essential role in coordinating and delivering Disaster and Emergency Management (DEM) program services (preparedness, response, mitigation, and recovery) pertaining to aviation disaster and emergency events. Over the past century, the Town of Gander and the Gander International Airport have also been the site of accumulated experiences, learnings, and developed skills from these efforts, all of which have become part of Gander’s unique history and have resulted in the establishment of comprehensive and integrated municipal and airport DEM plans critical to future responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".