MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406731044 · doi:10.23912/9781915097415-5855

Governance

2024· book-chapter· en· W4406731044 on OpenAlexaff
William O’Toole

Bibliographic record

VenueGoodfellow Publishers eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Administration Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Development Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Governance is the structure, processes, and policies that guide decision-making, management, and oversight of the event. It can be quite complex as an event is a project and the management must be dynamic, responding to risk, anticipating changes, looking for opportunities and keeping the work within the scope. Ideally it is set up prior to the planning of an event. However it must respond positively to the inevitable changes. The governance structure for events has two competing forces: stability and dynamism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGoodfellow Publishers eBooksSame topicPublic Policy and Administration ResearchFrench-language works237,207