MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406731095 · doi:10.23912/9781915097415-5861

Ethics

2024· book-chapter· en· W4406731095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGoodfellow Publishers eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsInternational Development Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Unless the LORD watches over the city, the watchmen stand guard in vain.” Psalm 127:1 This biblical quote carries profound implications beyond its religious context. In essence, it suggests that regardless of the number of systems, safeguards, and laws in place, the ultimate protection lies in the shared moral values of the people involved. This is reflected in contemporary anti-corruption papers which increasingly emphasize fostering ‘integrity’ rather than just focusing on preventing and detecting corrupt practices. In the dynamic field of event management, this approach holds particular relevance. While robust systems and controls are necessary, cultivating a culture of integrity among all stakeholders can be far more effective in maintaining ethical standards. THE shift in focus from mere compliance to the promotion of ethical behaviour aligns well with the complex and fast-paced nature of event management where adaptability and trust are crucial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it