MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406731653 · doi:10.23912/9781915097415-5852

Tools of identification and analysis

2024· book-chapter· en· W4406731653 on OpenAlexaff
William O’Toole

Bibliographic record

VenueGoodfellow Publishers eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsInternational Development Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Computer scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Standard: ISO 31010 contains a list of advanced tools for identifying, analysing and managing risks. Most of these are applicable to the risk of corruption. Below is an explanation of how they can be used in this context. Although the terminology is technical, most event teams already use a version of all the tools listed. However they may be unfamiliar with the professional terminology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0140.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0200.018
Open science0.0050.011
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.077

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGoodfellow Publishers eBooksSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207