MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406734073 · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20257003003

Data Visualization and Prediction Model Analysis

2025· article· en· W4406734073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueITM Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationComputer scienceData scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data visualization plays an important role in the process of data analysis. It can transform complex data into intuitive charts, which helps us understand data more effectively. The purpose of this paper is to study the application of data visualization and compare different prediction models. In this work, I present three different prediction models and apply them on the US airline industry datasets by using Python as the programming language. Then these data sets are made into a bar graph and analy1zed through these three prediction models. Finally, this paper provides some suggestions on how to choose appropriate visualization tools based on data characteristics. This study not only enriches the application examples of data visualization, but also provides valuable reference for decision-making and predicting in data analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it