MSIMRS: Multi-Scale Superpixel Segmentation Integrating Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data for Lithology Identification in Semi-Arid Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithology classification stands as a pivotal research domain within geological Remote Sensing (RS). In recent years, extracting lithology information from multi-source RS data has become an inevitable trend. Various classification image primitives yield distinct outcomes in lithology classification. The current research on lithology classification utilizing RS data has predominantly concentrated on pixel-level classification, which suffers from a long classification time and high sensitivity to noise. In order to explore the application potential of superpixel segmentation in lithology classification, this study proposed the Multi-scale superpixel Segmentation Integrating Multi-source RS data (MSIMRS), and conducted a lithology classification study in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China combining MSIMRS and the Support Vector Machine (MSIMRS-SVM). In addition, pixel-level K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF) and SVM classification algorithms, as well as deep-learning models including Resnet50 (Res50), Efficientnet_B8 (Effi_B8), and Vision Transformer (ViT) were chosen for a comparative analysis. Among these methods, our proposed MSIMRS-SVM achieved the highest accuracy in lithology classification in a typical semi-arid area, Duolun County, with an overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of 92.9% and 0.92. Moreover, the findings indicate that incorporating superpixel segmentation into lithology classification resulted in notably fewer fragmented patches and significantly improved the visualization effect. The results showcase the application potential of superpixel primitives in lithology information extraction within semi-arid areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".