MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406740965 · doi:10.1364/jocn.538478

Enabling ROADM in mode division multiplexing networks with mode-selective switches

2025· article· en· W4406740965 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sunami Sajjanam Morrison, Zheng Ma, Rebecca Rogers, Dusan Gostimirovic, Kaveh Hassan Rahbardar Mojaver, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultiplexingTime-division multiplexingMode (computer interface)Computer scienceWavelength-division multiplexingComputer networkDivision (mathematics)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsOptoelectronicsEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mode division multiplexing (MDM) enhances optical communication systems by introducing an additional multiplexing dimension. We designed and validated a reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) prototype using MDM as an optical subsystem targeting data center interconnects and metro optical networks. Our MDM-ROADM employs a mode-selective switch at each node, selectively de/multiplexing the first three transverse-electric (TE) modes. Key components are based on 220 nm silicon photonics, using subwavelength grating structures and inverse design methodology. Machine learning-based fabrication correction, via our tool PreFab, improved mode selectivity by 57% for mode-selective thermo-optic phase shifters. We also developed mode filters for two modes with a crosstalk of −9dB for TE 0 and −15dB for TE 1 within a 35 nm wavelength range. Experimental validation using TE 0 and TE 1 modes at 1555 nm shows an aggregate payload transmission of 80 Gb/s NRZ and a PAM-4 transmission at 40 Gbaud with a bit error rate of 1.1×10 −9 and 3.8×10 −3 , respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Optical Communications and NetworkingSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207