The Guiding Significance of the Happiness Concept of Ancient Greek Philosophers (Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, etc.) for Modern Citizen Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the guiding significance of the ancient Greek philosopher's view of happiness to modern citizen life. This paper reveals the application value in modern society by deeply analyzing the happiness concept of ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle and Socrates. In terms of research methods, this paper adopts the combination of literature research and theoretical analysis, and deeply digs into the connotation and characteristics of the ancient Greek philosopher's view of happiness; Combining it with the actual situation of modern citizens' life, this paper discusses its application prospect in the fields of family education, school education and workplace life. The research shows that the happiness view of ancient Greek philosophers has far-reaching guiding significance for modern citizens' life. They emphasize the importance of spiritual satisfaction, moral cultivation and self-awareness, and provide valuable action guides for modern people to pursue a happy life. At the same time, these views on happiness show modern value in promoting personal happiness and social harmony, which is helpful to build a better and more harmonious modern society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".