Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-risk colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. High-risk colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia (HR-CAN) can be difficult to treat using traditional endoscopic resection methods. This study evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with IBD and HR-CANs. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study consecutively included patients with IBD who were referred to expert Italian endoscopy centers for ESD or hybrid ESD (hESD) of HR-CANs. The main outcomes were rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resections, adverse events, local recurrence, metachronous lesions, and post-resection surgery. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival rates. Risk factors associated with the main outcomes were investigated by univariable analysis. RESULTS: 91 patients with colonic IBD (disease duration 15.3 [SD 8.7] years, 82.4 % with ulcerative colitis) with 96 HR-CANs (mean size 34.8 [SD 16.2] mm, 53.1 % high grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma) were included. ESD and hESD were performed in 82.3 % and 17.7 %, respectively. En bloc, R0, and curative resections were achieved in 95.8 % (95 %CI 89.6-98.8), 85.4 % (95 %CI 76.7-91.7), and 83.3 % (95 %CI 74.3-90.1). Adverse events occurred in 12.5 % (95 %CI 6.6-20.8), which were all conservatively managed. After a mean follow-up of 23.4 (SD 16.1) months, local recurrence and metachronous lesions each occurred in 3.1 %. Post-resection surgery was required in 11.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: ESD of HR-CANs showed favorable outcomes on the medium- and long-term course in patients with IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it