Piezoelectric energy harvesting: a review of energy sources, structures, and working mechanisms in high-frequency excitations and operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The advancement of information and energy technologies has spurred an increased demand for low-power and compact electronic devices with across various fields. Developing energy harvesting technologies to capture ambient and sustainable energy offers a promising solution to complement or replace conventional batteries. The piezoelectric technique provides a solution for energy harvesting from different energy sources, and high-frequency operation in piezoelectric energy harvesting offers several advantages. These include increased power output, as more charge is generated per unit of time, which increases the current. Additionally, better alignment with the natural resonance of piezoelectric elements enhances energy conversion efficiency. Considering the growing interest in efficient energy harvesting, a review of recent advancements in piezoelectric energy harvesting under high-frequency excitations and operations is presented in this paper. A brief introduction to the operating modes of piezoelectric energy harvester (PEH) is first introduced to provide a general understanding of energy conversion from the piezoelectric effect. PEHs under high-frequency operations from different energy sources are then reviewed and classified into three categories: wind, vehicle and train, and water flow. Next, novel ideas and structures to facilitate high-frequency operations for PEHs are summarized and discussed in detail. Subsequently, the working mechanisms for PEHs under high-frequency operations are described in detail and classified into three groups: high-speed rotation, frequency up-conversion, and friction-induced vibration mechanisms. Finally, applying advanced piezoelectric materials in novel structures and fostering application-oriented prototype testing are identified as trends for future development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".