Research on Postoperative Scar Quality of Sutures and Skin Surface Adhesives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: is established, its use can be expanded for more cases and higher quality medical care can be provided. Methods: and nylon threads, and the time was measured. At the second surgery, all scars were removed, and a histopathological examination was done. Scars were evaluated with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS), and statistical analysis was performed. Results: group. Postoperative VSS scores for pliability were significantly lower in the suture group, and the total VSS score was significantly lower in the suture group from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Patients rated postoperative wound pain, itching, appearance, and satisfaction with the VAS, but no significant differences were observed between the two groups. The scars were compared with hematoxylin-eosin staining and Elastica van Gieson staining. Differences were seen in the increase of elastic fibers in the dermal reticular layer, a characteristic difference between the two groups. Conclusions: can be further expanded in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".