MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406749931 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0182

Assessment of the role of pavement preservation in extending service life using the LTPP database

2025· article· en· W4406749931 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chukwunwike Okwuenu, Omar Elbagalati, Heather Dylla, Mohab El-Hakim, Mena I. Souliman, Michael Elwardany

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService lifeDatabaseComputer scienceService (business)EngineeringReliability engineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of four pavement preservation techniques: crack sealing, thin hot mix asphalt (HMA) overlay, chip seal, and slurry seal, using the long-term pavement performance data obtained from the specific pavement study-3 experiment. The impact of the pavement preservation techniques to mitigate longitudinal cracks in the wheel path, and rutting was analyzed. Environmental and cost considerations were employed to understand the role of preservation in extending the service life of highway infrastructure, reducing environmental impacts, and saving cost. Considering the cost and performance of treatments, thin HMA overlay, and chip sealing were the most cost-effective treatments. However, the equivalent CO 2 (eCO 2 ) of HMA overlay was higher than other types of treatments. In many cases, chip seal performed best from performance and environmental standing point as it has the lowest eCO 2 and displayed effectiveness in extending pavement service life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207