MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406752531 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453546

Atmospheric dynamics of the hypergiant RW Cep during the Great Dimming

2025· article· en· W4406752531 on OpenAlexaff
Anni Kasikov, I. Kolka, A. Aret, T. Eenmäe, V. Checha, V. Mitrokhina, Sheng-Jun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeStockholms UniversitetTurun YliopistoSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversitetet i OsloEesti TeadusagentuurAarhus UniversitetEuropean CommissionUK Research and InnovationAkademie Věd České RepublikyEuropean Space AgencyHáskóli Íslands
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyDynamics (music)SupergiantAtmospheric dynamicsAstrobiologyAtmospheric sciencesStarsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context . The hypergiant RW Cep is one of the largest stars in the Galaxy. The evolution and mass loss of such stars have profound effects on their surrounding regions and their galaxy as a whole. Between 2020 and 2024, RW Cep experienced a historic mass-loss event known as the Great Dimming. Aims . This study provides a spectroscopic analysis of RW Cep during the Great Dimming. We examine its atmospheric dynamics and place it in the context of the star’s variability behaviour since the early 2000s. Methods . We conducted high-cadence spectroscopic observations of RW Cep during the dimming event using the Tartu Observatory 1.5-meter telescope and the Nordic Optical Telescope. We analysed the atmospheric dynamics by measuring the radial velocities and line depths of Fe I and other spectral lines. Results . The radial velocities of the Fe I lines reveal a vertical velocity gradient of 10–20 km s −1 in the atmosphere, correlating with the strength of the spectral lines. Stronger lines, formed in higher atmospheric layers, have higher radial velocities. We measured the systemic velocity at −50.3 km s −1 . During the dimming, radial velocities were affected by additional emission from the ejected gas, which was blue-shifted relative to the absorption lines. Post-dimming, we observed large-scale atmospheric motions with an amplitude of ~25 km s −1 . Strong resonance lines of Ba II , K I , Na I , and Ca I showed stable central emission components at −56 km s −1 , which are likely of circumstellar origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207