Detection of Escherichia coli bacteria using surface plasmon resonance-wavelength interrogation setup
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last 20 years have seen significant progress in Surface Plasmonic Resonance (SPR), which has applications in material characterization, chemical sensing, biosensing, and other domains. SPR's increased sensitivity to changes in the materials' refractive indices has made it common in biosensing applications. In this study, we built an affordable SPR sensor system in our lab using wavelength interrogation setup. The suggested setup was developed and included a spectrophotometer, polarization sheet, attenuator, and a supercontinuum white light source. The SPR phenomenon is attained when a p-polarized light beam incident above a semicircular prism, which serves as a coupling medium and is attached to a thin layer of 53 nm thickness of gold (Au) by a matching oil. The SPR phenomenon is based on the wavelength, refractive index, and the angle as well. The dielectric medium can be changed, which changes the SPR angle as a result. Fixing the SPR angle while detecting the SPR wavelength over a broad wavelength range (400 to 700nm) is our main objective. Pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) can have fatal effects on human health. It is possible that the water that is contaminated contains E. coli. In order to mimic the contaminated water, E. coli analytes with various concentrations were prepared using the serial dilution method and were diluted in sterilized deionized water with concentrations of (10-1 to 10-10) cells/mL. Achieving the lowest concentration of E. coli analytes to ascertain the limit of detection (LOD) and the sensitivity of the created SPR setup are the goals of the serial dilution approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".