Self-Adaptive Dynamic In-Band Network Telemetry Orchestration for Balancing Accuracy and Stability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In-band network telemetry (INT) is an emerging network measurement technique that offers real-time and fine-grained visualization capabilities for networks. However, the utilization of INT for network measurement introduces additional overheads to the network. The process of data collection consumes extra bandwidth resources, and adjustments to the data collection scheme can impact network stability. Additionally, the INT orchestration scheme requires adaptation to dynamics in the network to improve measurement accuracy. Therefore, striking a balance between accuracy and stability becomes a critical problem. In this paper, our focus lies in the trade-off between measurement accuracy and network stability. We consider the long-term orchestration of multiple telemetry tasks, rationally deploying distinct telemetry tasks to different application flows. To address the challenge, we propose a self-adaptive Dynamic INT Orchestration scheme, D-INTO. Specifically, we formulate a stochastic optimization problem for dynamic INT orchestration. Then we employ Lyapunov optimization to decouple the stochastic optimization problem and use surrogate Lagrangian relaxation to construct a polynomial-time approximation algorithm. Theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate that our proposed D-INTO outperforms existing schemes in terms of adaptability to the network dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it