An importance-performance analysis of public transport to the university campus based on best-worst scaling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
University campuses represent important transport attraction poles in cities due to the large number of students, faculty and administrative staff who commute to the campus daily. The campus location can significantly increase traffic around the area, especially during the class entry and exit times. Therefore, public transport systems are essential to facilitate access to the university campus worldwide, especially for students. This study aims to evaluate the level of importance and satisfaction with factors that affect public transport use among university students. In this context, a best-worst scaling experimental design is used to carry out an important performance analysis (IPA) of public transport services to university campuses in Gran Canaria by estimating a Mixed Logit model. Thus, it will be possible to determine what attributes should be prioritised when implementing policies for improving these services. The results showed that public transport managers and university authorities should primarily focus on providing direct services and improving punctuality and bus frequency. Our results also provide valuable insights into the search for the best policies that match students’ transport mobility preferences with the service provision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it