MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406775175 · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1514933

WIMUSim: simulating realistic variabilities in wearable IMUs for human activity recognition

2025· article· en· W4406775175 on OpenAlexaff
Nobuyuki Oishi, Philip Birch, Daniel Roggen, Paula Lago

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Physics simulation has emerged as a promising approach to generate virtual Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data, offering a solution to reduce the extensive cost and effort of real-world data collection. However, the fidelity of virtual IMU depends heavily on the quality of the source motion data, which varies with motion capture setups. We hypothesize that improving virtual IMU fidelity is crucial to fully harness the potential of physics simulation for virtual IMU data generation in training Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models. Method To investigate this, we introduce WIMUSim, a 6-axis wearable IMU simulation framework designed to accurately parameterize real IMU properties when deployed on people. WIMUSim models IMUs in wearable sensing using four key parameters: Body (skeletal model), Dynamics (movement patterns), Placement (device positioning), and Hardware (IMU characteristics). Using these parameters, WIMUSim simulates virtual IMU through differentiable vector manipulations and quaternion rotations. A key novelty enabled by this approach is the identification of WIMUSim parameters using recorded real IMU data through gradient descent-based optimization, starting from an initial estimate. This process enhances the fidelity of the virtual IMU by optimizing the parameters to closely mimic the recorded IMU data. Adjusting these identified parameters allows us to introduce physically plausible variabilities. Results Our fidelity assessment demonstrates that WIMUSim accurately replicates real IMU data with optimized parameters and realistically simulates changes in sensor placement. Evaluations using exercise and locomotion activity datasets confirm that models trained with optimized virtual IMU data perform comparably to those trained with real IMU data. Moreover, we demonstrate the use of WIMUSim for data augmentation through two approaches: Comprehensive Parameter Mixing, which enhances data diversity by varying parameter combinations across subjects, outperforming models trained with real and non-optimized virtual IMU data by 4–10 percentage points (pp); and Personalized Dataset Generation, which customizes augmented datasets to individual user profiles, resulting in average accuracy improvements of 4 pp, with gains exceeding 10 pp for certain subjects. Discussion These results underscore the benefit of high-fidelity virtual IMU data and WIMUSim's utility in developing effective data generation strategies, alleviating the challenge of data scarcity in sensor-based HAR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Computer ScienceSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207