MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406778756 · doi:10.1002/jmri.29691

<scp>MRI</scp> Radiomics Analysis in the Diagnostic Differentiation of Malignant Soft Tissue Myxoid Sarcomas From Benign Soft Tissue Musculoskeletal Myxomas

2025· article· en· W4406778756 on OpenAlexaff
Hadas Benhabib, Daniel Brandenberger, Katherine Lajkosz, Elizabeth G. Demicco, Kim Tsoi, Jay S. Wunder, Peter C. Ferguson, Anthony M. Griffin, Ali Naraghi, Masoom A. Haider, Lawrence M. White

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationMedicineSarcomaMyxomaReceiver operating characteristicSoft tissueMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologySoft tissue sarcomaPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of benign myxomas and malignant myxoid sarcomas can be difficult with an overlapping spectrum of morphologic MR findings. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic utility of MRI radiomics in the differentiation of musculoskeletal myxomas and myxoid sarcomas. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 523 patients were included; histologically proven myxomas (N = 201) and myxoid sarcomas (N = 322), randomly divided (70:30) into training:test subsets. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted fat-suppressed (fluid-sensitive), and T1-weighted post-contrast (T1W + C) sequences at 1.0 T, 1.5 T, or 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT: Seven semantic (qualitative) tumor features were assessed in each case. Manual 3D tumor segmentations performed with radiomics features extracted from T1W, fluid-sensitive, and T1W + C acquisitions. Models were constructed based on radiomic features from individual sequences and from their combination, both with and without the addition of qualitative tumor features. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation evaluated in 60 cases segmented by three readers. Features with intraclass correlation <0.7 excluded from further analysis. Boruta feature selection and Random Forest modeling performed using the training-dataset, with resultant models used to assess class discrimination (myxoma vs. myxoid sarcoma) in the test dataset. Radiomics score defined as probability class = myxoma. Logistic regression modeling employed to estimate performance of the radiomics score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess diagnostic performance, and DeLong's test to assess performance between constructed models. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Four qualitative semantic features showed significant predictive power in class discrimination. Radiomic models demonstrated excellent differentiation of myxomas from myxoid sarcomas: AUC of 0.9271 (T1W), 0.9049 (fluid-sensitive), and 0.9179 (T1W + C). Incorporation of multiparametric data or semantic features did not significantly improve model performance (P ≥ 0.08) compared to radiomic models derived from any individual MRI sequence alone. DATA CONCLUSION: MRI radiomics appears to be accurate in the differentiation of myxomas from myxoid sarcomas. Classification performance did not improve when incorporating qualitative features or multiparametric imaging data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Accurately distinguishing between benign soft tissue myxomas and malignant myxoid sarcomas is essential for guiding appropriate management but remains challenging with conventional MRI interpretation. This study utilized radiomics, a method that extracts quantitative mathematically derived features from images, to develop predictive models based on routine MRI examination. Analyzing over 500 cases, MRI radiomics demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign myxomas and malignant myxoid sarcomas, highlighting the potential of the technique, as a powerful non-invasive tool that could complement current diagnostic approaches, and enhance clinical decision-making in patients with soft tissue myxoid tumors of the musculoskeletal system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207