MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406780000 · doi:10.1093/jbmr/zjaf009

Assessing the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on bone utilizing machine learning–assisted opportunistic quantitative computed tomography

2025· article· en· W4406780000 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryn E. Matheson, Jacob L. Jaremko, Alexandra Dowhanik, Jasmine Gill, Cassandra Gallant, John Walker, Nathan Armani, William D. Leslie, Michael Kolinsky, Steven K. Boyd, Carrie Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineConfoundingBone mineralQuantitative computed tomographyCohortInternal medicineOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in cancer treatment, yet their impact on bone health remains unclear. This study aimed to perform a retrospective cohort study utilizing routine CT scans from patients with melanoma to perform opportunistic QCT analysis to investigate the effects of ICI treatment on skeletal health, including volumetric BMD (vBMD) measurements and osteoarthritis (OA) parameters. A previously established machine learning-assisted opportunistic QCT pipeline was used to estimate lumbar spine vBMD from baseline and 12-mo follow-up CT scans in patients with melanoma treated with ICI therapy and those not treated with ICI therapy. Facet joint OA, osteophyte formation, and endplate sclerosis were also graded. Independent and paired t tests were used to determine any differences in vBMD and OA parameters between ICI users and non-ICI users. Multivariable linear regression models were used to control for confounding variables. Non-ICI users had a significant decrease in vBMD of -6.96 mg/cm3 from baseline to follow-up, whereas the ICI users had no significant change. There was a significant difference in change in vBMD from baseline to follow-up between the 2 groups, with the non-ICI users experiencing a 11.22 mg/cm3 larger decrease in vBMD. After adjusting for baseline age, sex, baseline vBMD, and change in OA parameters, this difference remained significant at -13.04 mg/cm3. Among the ICI users, those who had a decline in vBMD had a lower baseline vBMD compared with those who had increased vBMD. Neither group showed a significant change in OA parameters over the follow-up period, nor a difference in change between ICI and non-ICI users, even after adjusting for sex, age, and baseline OA parameters. While the effects of ICI treatment on vBMD may vary based on baseline bone health, ICIs do not significantly impact OA parameters in the short term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207