Influence of π–π interactions on organic photocatalytic materials and their performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, organic photocatalyst-based photocatalysis has garnered significant attention as an environmentally friendly and sustainable reaction system due to the preferable structural flexibility and adjustable optoelectronic features of organic photocatalysts. In addition, π-π interactions, as one of the common non-bonded interactions, play an important role in the structure and property adjustments of organic photocatalysts due to their unique advantages in modulating the electronic structure, facilitating charge migration, and influencing interfacial reactions. However, studies summarizing the relationship between the π-π interactions of organic photocatalysts and their photocatalytic performance are still rare. Therefore, in this review, we introduced the types of π-π interactions, characterization techniques, and different types of organic photocatalytic materials. Then, the influence of π-π interactions on photocatalysis and the modification strategies of π-π interactions were summarized. Finally, we discussed their influence on photocatalytic performance in different photocatalytic systems and analyzed the challenges and prospects associated with harnessing π-π interactions in photocatalysis. The review provides a clear map for understanding π-π interaction formation mechanism and its application in organic photocatalysts, offering useful guidance for researchers in this field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it