MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406782408 · doi:10.18280/mmep.120107

Numerical Study About the Effect of Circular Pin Configuration in Heat Sink on Heat Transfer

2025· article· en· W4406782408 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat sinkHeat transferMechanicsSink (geography)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this research is to examine the effect of various circular pin arrangements in heat sinks' thermal behavior.The various pin shapes include circular pins, circular pins with circumferential grooves, circular pins with hollow, perforated circular pins, and slit circular pins with the performance of the heat dissipating examined.The study uses quantitative techniques of data analysis.The numerical simulations are made with the help of ANSYS Fluent that uses the standard k- turbulence model.These simulations are done in 3-D to account for the flow of heat and fluids as they occur in real life.Reynolds numbers and heat fluxes are properly chosen and explained to achieve applicability in real life conditions.From the results, it can be seen that the heat transfer performance of the heat sinks is highly dependent on different arrangements of the pin.There is also a comparison of different kinds of pins and their thermal performanceit is stated that perforated and slit circular pins deliver higher performance than simple circular pins.Comparisons of the various configurations are made from the viewpoint of heat transfer coefficient, Nusselt number, and pressure drop.In the case of forced convection, five different forms of a pin fin heat sink have been examined with Re varying from 10714.3 to 432142.86 and heat fluxes ranging from 3000 W/m 2 to 23000 W/m 2 .It can therefore be ascertained that with the right modification to the pin configurations significant enhancement can be achieved in heat sinks thermal efficiency.The results that are given by this study can be used to inform the design of improved cooling systems in electronic devices.Future work should include additional experiments and the investigation of other geometrical changes for heat sink improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it