Raphael Merida, Fabio Ruggiano, Sabine Schwarze (a cura di) (2024), Tradizioni del discorso sulla lingua nella stampa periodica italiana dal Settecento a oggi, Berlino, Peter Lang, 337 p. [ISBN 978-3-631-89286-2]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Il volume raccoglie sedici contributi, frutto di un convegno tenutosi nel dicembre 2022 all’Università di Augsburg. Al centro dell’opera, curata da Raphael Merida, Fabio Ruggiano e Sabine Schwarze, vi è la riflessione linguistica che si è sviluppatasi nei periodici italiani dal XVIII secolo fino ai più recenti sviluppi digitali. Questo studio si inserisce in un più ampio panorama di ricerche sul ruolo della stampa periodica europea, promosso dal gruppo di ricerca Research Network for the History of European Periodicals (R-NHEP), e contribuisce significativamente alla riflessione interdisciplinare sul rapporto tra giornalismo e lingua. Il volume è suddiviso in due sezioni: la prima approfondisce le pubblicazioni del Settecento e Ottocento, mentre la seconda analizza periodici novecenteschi e moderni, inclusi i media digitali come i blog. [...] »
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".