The 2020 <i>M</i>w 6.4 Koryak Highlands earthquake illustrates hidden seismic hazards in the northern Pacific Cordillera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY On 2020 January 9, an Mw 6.4 earthquake struck the central Koryak Highlands of eastern Siberia, northeast of the diffuse triple junction between the North American, Pacific and Eurasian plates. The largest earthquake recorded in the central Koryak Highlands to date, it provides an excellent opportunity to study the little-known active tectonics of this remote, sparsely instrumented region. We mapped coherent, coseismic surface deformation with Sentinel 1 Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), making this one of the highest latitude earthquakes to be captured successfully with satellite radar, in spite of the rugged, snow-covered terrain. Elastic dislocation modelling, teleseismic backprojections, calibrated hypocentral relocations and teleseismic moment tensor solutions are used to resolve a left-lateral fault trending northwestwards, proximal but perpendicular to a regional geological suture zone, the Khatyrka–Vyvenka Thrust. The earthquake probably ruptured unilaterally northwestwards along a 20 km long segment that appears indistinct in the local topography, and likely generated no surface rupture. We interpret that these observations are indicative of a structurally immature fault zone and estimate a seismogenic zone thickness of 10–15 km. The Koryak Highlands earthquake illustrates how terrane boundaries within cordilleran belts may continue to accommodate tectonic strain long after accretion, resulting in significant earthquakes even along hidden faults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".