Folic acid-containing supplement use among females aged 15-55 in the Canadian Community Health Survey 2015-2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction In Canada, those who are or who could become pregnant are recommended to consume a daily multivitamin containing 400 µg of folic acid to help prevent neural tube defects. Objectives To report the prevalence and determinants of folic acid-containing supplement use among females of childbearing age in Canada. Methods Data were combined from cycles 2015/16 and 2017/18 of the maternal experiences module of the cross-sectional Canadian Community Health Survey, which was completed by females aged 15-55 years. Representative weighted estimates (means/percentages, 95% CI) were generated for folic acid-containing supplement use among all pregnant, non-pregnant, and lactating respondents. For those who had given birth in the preceding 5 years, estimates were also generated for supplement use in the 3 months before and first 3 months of their most recent pregnancy, and pre-pregnancy awareness of the link between folic acid and some birth defects. We examined associations with sociodemographic factors using multivariable logistic regression. Results Overall, 16.5% (15.9-17.0%) of non-pregnant, 80.3% (77.1-83.5%) of pregnant, and 58.4% (54.8-61.9%) of lactating females aged 15-55 reported using a folic acid-containing supplement. Among those who had given birth in the preceding 5 years, 63.7% ( 62.2-65.1%) consumed a folic acid-containing supplement in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, while 89.9% (88.8-90.9%) did so during the first trimester. Lower prevalence of supplement use before or during pregnancy was reported among the 23.7% (22.4-25.1%) of respondents unaware of the relationship between folic acid and birth defects. Younger age, single marital status, lower educational attainment, income below the median, and smoking were associated with lower odds of awareness or supplement use. Conclusion While most females living in Canada reported using folic-acid containing supplements prior to and during pregnancy, use of these supplements among non-pregnant females of childbearing age is low, and sociodemographic inequalities exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".