MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406788947 · doi:10.14740/jcgo1009

Pregnancy Complicated by Complete Atrioventricular Block

2025· article· en· W4406788947 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuda Putra Disastra, Dalri M. Suhartomo, Wiryawan Permadi, Abraham Avicenna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Education and Training
KeywordsMedicineAtrioventricular blockPregnancyBlock (permutation group theory)ObstetricsInternal medicineCombinatoricsGeneticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bradycardia in pregnancy resulting from complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a rare but critical condition that can threaten both maternal and fetal health. If not managed appropriately, it can lead to severe complications, emphasizing the need for timely diagnosis and intervention. The incidence of CAVB during pregnancy is approximately 1 in 15,000 to 20,000 pregnancies. Most cases present clinically with symptoms such as syncope or palpitations, highlighting the importance of prompt recognition and management. While some patients with CAVB may be asymptomatic, symptomatic cases require urgent and definitive management. There is currently no established guideline for managing CAVB during pregnancy. We report the case of a 20-year-old primigravida at 35 weeks and 5 days of gestation, who presented with heart conduction problems (i.e., bradycardia) and arrived at the obstetric emergency department after receiving magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis due to her high-risk profile and two intravenous doses of atropine sulfate. The patient experienced seizures and worsening bradycardia, prompting an emergency cesarean section. A female infant was delivered with a birth weight of 2,525 g, a length of 45 cm, and a New Ballard Score corresponding to gestational age of 36 weeks. No congenital anomalies were identified. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged with a cardiologist’s recommendation for follow-up echocardiography. CAVB in pregnancy can arise from either congenital or acquired conditions, both of which may lead to maternal cardiovascular decompensation and fetal complications. In such cases, pacemaker implantation is often required to manage symptomatic bradycardia, and cesarean section may be the preferred mode of delivery to ensure both maternal and fetal safety. This case highlights the critical need for timely and appropriate management of symptomatic CAVB during pregnancy. Pacemaker implantation serves as the definitive treatment option for pregnant patients with CAVB, effectively addressing bradycardia and preventing further complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207