MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406789555 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13596

New Oracles and Labeling Schemes for Vertex Cut Queries

2025· preprint· en· W4406789555 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yonggang Jiang, Merav Parter, Asaf Petruschka

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationEuropean Commission
KeywordsVertex (graph theory)Computer scienceMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the succinct representations of vertex cuts by centralized oracles and labeling schemes. For an undirected $n$-vertex graph $G = (V,E)$ and integer parameter $f \geq 1$, the goal is supporting vertex cut queries: Given $F \subseteq V$ with $|F| \leq f$, determine if $F$ is a vertex cut in $G$. In the centralized data structure setting, it is required to preprocess $G$ into an $f$-vertex cut oracle that can answer such queries quickly, while occupying only small space. In the labeling setting, one should assign a short label to each vertex in $G$, so that a cut query $F$ can be answered by merely inspecting the labels assigned to the vertices in $F$. While the ``$st$ cut variants'' of the above problems have been extensively studied and are known to admit very efficient solutions, the basic (global) ``cut query'' setting is essentially open (particularly for $f > 3$). This work achieves the first significant progress on these problems: [$f$-Vertex Cut Labels:] Every $n$-vertex graph admits an $f$-vertex cut labeling scheme, where the labels have length of $\tilde{O}(n^{1-1/f})$ bits (when $f$ is polylogarithmic in $n$). This nearly matches the recent lower bound given by Long, Pettie and Saranurak (SODA 2025). [$f$-Vertex Cut Oracles:] For $f=O(\log n)$, every $n$-vertex graph $G$ admits $f$-vertex cut oracle with $\tilde{O}(n)$ space and $\tilde{O}(2^f)$ query time. We also show that our $f$-vertex cut oracles for every $1 \leq f \leq n$ are optimal up to $n^{o(1)}$ factors (conditioned on plausible fine-grained complexity conjectures). If $G$ is $f$-connected, i.e., when one is interested in \emph{minimum} vertex cut queries, the query time improves to $\tilde{O}(f^2)$, for any $1 \leq f \leq n$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207