MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406794994 · doi:10.20906/sbai-sbse-2023/3970

Modelo PLIM aprimorado para melhoria da confiabilidade de redes de distribuição ativas

2023· article· pt· W4406794994 on OpenAlexaff
Gederson A. da Cruz, Sérgio Haffner, Mariana Resener

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Elétricos · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for assessing the reliability of active distribution networks through the estimation of network operation during normal conditions and contingencies. The adopted approach enables an analysis of the impact of transforming a passive network into an active network, as it considers self-healing mechanisms that implement topology modifications, including power restoration through microgrids and interconnection lines. To validate the optimization model, a 12-node test system was employed. The results demonstrate the significance of active network operation in enhancing reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas ElétricosSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207