MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406796361 · doi:10.1097/yct.0000000000001110

Changes in Cerebral Hemodynamic Among Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy

2025· article· en· W4406796361 on OpenAlexaff
Keng-hong Chhoa, Soon‐Kiat Chiang, Kheng‐Yee Ong, Choon-keat Yong, Boon Chiang Ng, Siti Amira Othman, Roger S. McIntyre, JongKwan Choi, Jihyun Cha, Roger Ho, Kok Yoon Chee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ect · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYoung Mania Rating ScalePositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleVerbal fluency testElectroconvulsive therapyPsychologyBipolar disorderDorsolateral prefrontal cortexBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleManiaPost-hoc analysisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Rating scalePrefrontal cortexPsychiatryPsychosisClinical psychologyMedicineInternal medicineMoodCognitionNeuropsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: There remains a scarcity of studies to evaluate the treatment effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers a cost-effective method to measure cerebral hemodynamics. This study used fNIRS to evaluate the effect of ECT in patients suffering from schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (manic phase). Thirty patients with mania and 31 with schizophrenia were recruited. Each participant received 6 sessions of ECT. This study utilized the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and fNIRS-verbal fluency test paradigm at baseline and after each session of ECT. The prefrontal cortex hemodynamic response during the performance of verbal fluency test was recorded via a commercial wireless high-density continuous-wave fNIRS system device. The effect of categorical and continuous variables was determined using Pearson's chi-square test and Student's t test or 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparison, respectively. Comparing the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Young Mania Rating Scale scores between baseline, sessions 3 and 6, the scores were significantly decreased ( P < 0.001), with both patient groups achieving more than 50% reduction in scores from baseline to session 6. The fNIRS also showed significant increases in oxy-hemoglobin levels (session 6 vs baseline) in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for both patient groups ( P < 0.05). There were significant correlations in the reduction of symptom severity and increase in HbO 2 levels in people with bipolar disorder (manic phase) and schizophrenia ( P < 0.05). Monitoring the activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is an objective ECT monitoring indicator for patients suffering from bipolar disorder (manic phase) or schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EctSame topicElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesFrench-language works237,207