Microwave Thermal Treatment on Enhanced Cemented Tailings Backfill: An Experimental Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cemented tailings backfill (CTB), composed of tailings, binder, and water, is widely used for filling underground goaves in mining operations. Unmanaged tailings can occupy extensive land and pose significant environmental risks. Microwave technology offers a promising approach to enhance the utilization of tailings, reducing dependency on natural resources. However, limited research on microwave heating parameters has impeded its broader adoption. This study uses the orthogonal experimental method to study the influence of various factors on the strength of the CTB and to determine the impact capacity of each factor. Additionally, this study conducted a visual analysis of the microwave heating time (MHT), microwave delay time (MDT), cement-tailings ratio, slurry concentration and microwave power (MP) to verify the experimental results. The results show that microwave heating can enhance or diminish the mechanical properties of CTB samples at different curing ages, depending on the specific microwave parameter settings. Research indicates that microwave technology can be effectively applied to mine backfill materials to improve their early strength and the modulus of elasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".