MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406809122 · doi:10.47756/aihc.y9i1.138

AI Companions in Ride-Hailing: Enhancing Sense of Safety with Voice Chatbots

2024· article· en· W4406809122 on OpenAlexaff
Rocio E. Alvarado Contreras, Lizbeth Escobedo, Jessica Beltrán

Bibliographic record

VenueAvances en Interacción Humano-Computadora · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense (electronics)CommunicationAeronauticsComputer sciencePsychologyHuman–computer interactionAestheticsEngineeringArtElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the development and formative evaluation of AI Companion, a voice chatbot based on Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models designed to enhance users' perception of safety and control during transportation using ride-hailing apps or similar services. We conducted a study with 10 participants to understand their travel experiences and evaluate the AI Companion's ability to maintain coherent conversations, simulating a phone call. Our findings indicate that participants generally liked the system. However, we provide several recommendations for significant improvements to the AI Companion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvances en Interacción Humano-ComputadoraSame topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207