MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406809509 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200110

Investigating the Effect of Online Service Delivery on Purchasing Intention: Experience from Food Shoppers in Mogadishu, Somalia

2025· article· en· W4406809509 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liban Abdullahi Jama, Ibrahim Hassan Mohamud

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessPurchasingMarketingFood deliveryAdvertisingService (business)Service delivery frameworkFood service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate the impact of online service delivery on the purchasing intention of food buyers using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to provide a more robust understanding of online food purchase intention.A total of 416 questionnaires were obtained from consumers who had experience with online food delivery services in Mogadishu, Somalia.A partial least square (PLS) path modelling approach was used to analyze the collected data.The study result revealed that Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Control, and Perceived Ease of Purchase substantially impact the purchasing intention of food buyers in Mogadishu, Somalia.However, the findings did not support the hypotheses about Perceived Usefulness and Personal Awareness.This study contributes to the existing literature by examining the TPB and TAM theories in relation to the intention to purchase food online.The study also encourages further research to gain deeper insights and explore additional variables that might shape purchasing intention in this context, including political stability and technology infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicDiverse Scientific Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207