MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406816321 · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.008

Genome-wide association study on chronic postsurgical pain in the UK Biobank

2025· article· en· W4406816321 on OpenAlexaff
Song Li, Masja K. Toneman, Marc Parisien, Kris Vissers, Richard P. G. ten Broek, Regina L. M. van Boekel, Marieke J. H. Coenen

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Anaesthesia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsBiobankAssociation (psychology)MedicineChronic painGenome-wide association studyPhysical therapyBioinformaticsGeneticsPsychologyBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) persists beyond the expected healing period after surgery, imposing a substantial burden on overall patient well-being. Unfortunately, CPSP often remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. To better understand the mechanism of CPSP development, we aimed to identify genetic variants associated with CPSP. Methods A genome-wide association study was conducted in a cohort of 95,931 individuals from the UK Biobank who had undergone different surgical procedures. Three analyses were performed: (1) case–control analysis (2923 cases with CPSP and 93,008 controls), (2) ordinal analysis in three groups based on time of analgesics use ( n =95,931), and (3) a meta-analysis combining our dataset with a recent publication ( n =97,281). Results In the case–control analysis, one genetic locus within GLRA3 displayed a genome-wide significant ( P <2.5×10 −8 ) association with CPSP, and nine loci displayed suggestively significant associations ( P <1×10 −6 ). The ordinal analysis aligned with the case–control analysis, with an additional locus (rs140330443) reaching genome-wide significance. In the meta-analysis with the recently published dataset, the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs17298280 in the GLRA3 gene remained significant ( P =2.19×10 −9 ). Conclusions This study contributes new insights into the genetic factors associated with CPSP. The top hit GLRA3 is known for involvement in prostaglandin E2-induced pain processing pathways. Our study provides a foundation for future investigations into the function of these risk variants and the mechanisms underlying CPSP by offering summary statistics. However, further validation in other cohorts is required to confirm these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of AnaesthesiaSame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207