INTEGRATION OF URBAN HERITAGE INTO THE PERMANENT PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SAFEGUARDED AREAS IN THE CITY OF EL OUED, ALGERIA: CASE STUDY OF THE OLD QUARTER OF AL-ASHASH AND AL-MESSABA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preservation and integration of urban heritage into sustainable urban development are major challenges for historic cities. This article focuses on the integration of urban heritage into the Permanent Plan for the Protection and Enhancement of the Protected Sectors of the city of El Oued, Algeria, particularly in the old neighborhoods of Al-Ashash and Al-Messaba. Using a multidisciplinary approach and drawing on academic references such as Abdelazeem et al. (2024), Nasser et al. (2020), Kadhim & Hussein (2018), Kostešić et al. (2019), Mohammed et al. (2019), Komarova (2015), Misilmani (2024), Teklemariam (2024), Moser (2024), and relevant Algerian laws, this study examines the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating urban heritage into contemporary urban development. The findings highlight the importance of stakeholder participation, urban planning, and heritage management in ensuring the sustainable and balanced integration of urban heritage into urban development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".