Bimekizumab efficacy and safety through 3 years in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: long-term results from the BE RADIANT phase IIIb trial open-label extension period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overexpression of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F significantly influences psoriasis pathology. Until recently, biologics targeting IL-17A alone, like secukinumab, were used to treat psoriasis. Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that targets both IL-17A and IL-17F. BE RADIANT was the first phase III trial to investigate switching from selective inhibition of IL-17A to dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F. Bimekizumab has previously shown superior achievement of complete skin clearance [100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100)] vs. secukinumab through 48 weeks. Switching from secukinumab to bimekizumab resulted in improved clinical responses. Over 2 years, no new safety signals were observed. OBJECTIVES: To report the 3-year efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis receiving continuous bimekizumab or switching from secukinumab after 1 year. METHODS: The BE RADIANT phase IIIb randomized controlled trial had a 48-week double-blinded period, in which patients received bimekizumab [320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W)] or secukinumab (300 mg weekly to week 4, then Q4W). At week 16, patients randomized to bimekizumab underwent re-randomization to receive Q4W or Q8W maintenance dosing. From week 48 onward (open-label extension), all received bimekizumab. RESULTS: In total, 336 patients randomized to bimekizumab and 318 randomized to secukinumab at baseline entered the open-label extension. More patients randomized to bimekizumab achieved PASI 100 (modified nonresponder imputation) at year 1 (74.9%) vs. those randomized to secukinumab (52.8%). PASI 100 response rates were maintained over 3 years in patients treated with bimekizumab (68.8%) and increased in those randomized to secukinumab switching to bimekizumab (68.8%). Bimekizumab was well tolerated to 3 years. In patients who received ≥ 1 bimekizumab dose, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) over 3 years were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis and upper respiratory tract infection (exposure-adjusted incidence rates 12.2, 10.0 and 5.5/100 patient-years, respectively). Rates of TEAEs of interest, including serious infections, inflammatory bowel disease, and suicidal ideation and behaviour, did not increase with longer exposure to bimekizumab from 1 to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of patients randomized to bimekizumab and those who switched from secukinumab to bimekizumab achieved and maintained complete skin clearance over 3 years of treatment. Over 3 years, bimekizumab was well tolerated and TEAE rates did not increase with longer exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03536884.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".