MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406823997 · doi:10.2749/sanjose.2024.0048

Geneva St Ramp: Replacement of Steel Girder Bridge with Post-Tensioned Concrete Structure on Existing Foundations

2024· article· en· W4406823997 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantinos Kris Mermigas

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)GirderStructural engineeringEngineeringForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The ramp was built in 1963 as part of the original Hwy 406 south of St. Catharines. The existing bridge consisted of five simply supported spans of 22.6 m, each supported by two steel plate girders composite with a concrete deck. The ramp was regularly maintained through the years: a waterproofing membrane was added in 1979 along with sealed expansion joints, and the expansion joints replaced again in 1998. In 2015, the condition of major components had deteriorated significantly and coupled with concerns for redundancy and structural steel details vulnerable to constraint induced fracture (overlapping welds), led to the decision to replace the superstructure.</p><p>The ramp has complex geometry consisting of a tangent, a radial curve and two spirals in plan, a longitudinal grade increasing up to 5%, and the 9.35 m cross-section has variable superelevation. The ramp spans over a valley. After considering several alternatives (including filling in the valley), a post-tensioned concrete solid slab deck of 0.7 m thickness was selected for the replacement superstructure. The new deck is 0.8 m wider and 20% heavier than the steel superstructure it replaces. The geotechnical engineer reanalysed the steel pile foundations with current practices and found potential to increase capacities, later confirmed through additional boreholes.</p><p>The deck is supported on four slender piers monolithic with the deck, and on the existing abutments where semi-integral deck ends support the wingwalls and approach slabs. The reuse of foundations was a defining feature of the project, key to the success of the selected alternative, saving time and cost in construction. Construction of the bridge started in July 2021 and was completed in September 2022. The project demonstrates that post-tensioned concrete bridges can be built competitively with girder bridges and contribute to sustainability.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207