MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406824686 · doi:10.1002/adom.202402772

Wave‐Interference Photonic Crystals and Space Charge Engineering Enable Efficient Broadband Faint Light Detection in Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Photodetectors

2025· article· en· W4406824686 on OpenAlexaff
Yibo Zhang, Sara M. Almenabawy, Gloria Vytas, Moein Shayegannia, Haozhe Wang, Nazir P. Kherani

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorMaterials scienceBroadbandInterference (communication)OptoelectronicsPhotonicsPhotonic crystalOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Noise current, detectivity, quantum efficiency, and response speed are critical metrics in evaluating organic/inorganic photodiodes. Herein, these metrics are simultaneously advanced in poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)/native SiO x /n‐Si hybrid photodetectors, achieving excellent performance in detecting broadband faint light. Wave‐interference photonic crystals, comprising periodic microstructured inverse pyramids with nanometer‐scale mesa widths, are integrated into the Si absorber to effectively couple incident light for increased absorption, thereby balancing optics and conformal contact coverage. The developed photodetector comprises a deep depletion region and interfacial SiO x layer, enabling diffusion‐mitigated broadband photocarrier transport and effective charge collection, and suppressing carrier tunneling processes for low‐noise. An ultralow reverse dark current density of ≈2.46 × 10 −8 A cm −2 at −0.4 V is realized for nanowatt‐level light detection. The photodetector showcases superlative properties among reported PEDOT:PSS–based inorganic heterojunctions, including a broadband external quantum efficiency of >≈80% from 340 to 960 nm (internal quantum efficiency of >≈90% from 380 to 840 nm), detectivity of >≈10 12 Jones from 300 to 1140 nm, and microsecond response speed. This study provides practical insight for combining high‐absorption microstructures with space charge engineering for the development of high‐performance organic/inorganic hybrid photodetectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207