MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B016: Targeting the angiotensin receptor in cancer-associated fibroblasts improves tumour perfusion, oxygenation, and radiotherapy response

2025· article· en· W4406833883 on OpenAlexaff
Che-Min Lee, Brennan J. Wadsworth, Rachel A. Cederberg, Zihan Li, Kiersten N. Thomas, Meredith R. Clark, Rocky Shi, Michael G. Hall, Nikita Telkar, Ryan Urban, Wan L. Lam, Sarah Hamilton, Kevin L. Bennewith

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxygenationCancerPerfusionRadiation therapyReceptorCancer researchAngiotensin IIOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The solid tumor microenvironment is a key determinant of successful cancer therapy, with hypoxic tumor cells known to contribute to poor therapeutic outcome after radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Several targeted therapies have been developed against hypoxic tumor cells that have shown promise in combination with radiation therapy in pre-clinical models and early phase clinical trials, although the difficulty inherent in targeting hypoxic cells has limited the overall efficacy of this approach. Our recent data suggest that hypoxia can develop in solid tumors due to the activity of sub-populations of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and that therapeutically targeting CAF activation can restrict the development of tumor hypoxia and prime tumors to respond to radiation therapy. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers (ARBs) are anti-hypertensive agents that inhibit the activity of the signaling peptide angiotensin II derived from the renin-angiotensin system. ARBs can also exhibit anti-fibrotic activity by blocking the AT1R expressed on myofibroblasts in various tissues. We recently found that the ARB telmisartan inhibits the deposition of collagen I in solid tumors, increasing net tumor perfusion and stabilizing microregional tumor blood flow. Collagen I can be produced by CAFs, although recent clinical data have identified multiple, functionally-diverse CAF subsets in breast and ovarian tumors. To understand how ARBs affect the solid tumor microenvironment, we wanted to determine how the ARB telmisartan influences the activity of CAF subsets and whether telmisartan-associated changes in perfusion impact hypoxia and radiation response in solid tumors. We identified several murine CAF subsets that could be discriminated by cell surface marker expression across a panel of seven tumor xenograft lines. Using single cell RNAseq of cells isolated from tumors with or without ARB treatment, we found that telmisartan altered the transcriptome of CAF subsets and inhibited CAF activation. In tumors containing myofibroblast-like CAFs, telmisartan decreased collagen deposition and eliminated ‘acute’ hypoxia that can be caused by unstable microregional perfusion. Telmisartan-treated tumors also had improved response to ionizing radiation therapy. Taken together, our data indicate that CAFs contribute to tumor hypoxia and radiation resistance of solid tumors in an AT1R-dependent manner. Using a retrospective cohort of over 1,100 oropharyngeal cancer patients, we also found that patients taking ARBs for hypertension had dramatically improved therapeutic outcomes after radiation therapy. Our work indicates that CAFs contribute to the development of hypoxia in solid tumors and suggests that angiotensin receptor blockers represent a novel targeted therapy to inhibit CAF activity, modify the solid tumor microenvironment, reduce tumor hypoxia, and improve radiation response. Citation Format: Che-Min Lee, Brennan J. Wadsworth, Rachel A. Cederberg, Zi Han Li, Kiersten N. Thomas, Meredith Clark, Rocky Shi, Michael Hall, Nikita Telkar, Ryan Urban, Wan L. Lam, Sarah N. Hamilton, Kevin L. Bennewith. Targeting the angiotensin receptor in cancer-associated fibroblasts improves tumour perfusion, oxygenation, and radiotherapy response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Targeted Therapies in Combination with Radiotherapy; 2025 Jan 26-29; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→